Best Practice Guide: Managing Precedence & Naming Standards in Entra Conditional Access
Table of Contents
What is Conditional Access
Understanding Conditional Access Precedence
Managing Policy Precedence Effectively
Best Practices for Policy Naming Standards
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Final Thoughts
What is Conditional Access
Entra Conditional Access is an essential component of Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD), enabling organisations to enforce security policies that govern how users access resources within and outside of the ecosystem. As organisations scale and their security needs become more complex, managing the precedence of these policies becomes fundamental to ensuring that the right security measures are applied consistently and without conflict. Additionally, having a clear and consistent policy naming convention is crucial for maintaining clarity and ease of management, especially in large environments.
This guide delivers the best practices for managing precedence in Conditional Access and outlines proven standards for naming your policies effectively.
Enjoy the article and remember to follow us on LinkedIn if you like what you read.
Understanding Conditional Access Precedence
Conditional Access policies in Entra ID are applied in a specific order, which can impact how multiple policies interact with each other. The precedence is determined by several factors:
Specificity
More specific policies take precedence over broader ones. For example, a policy targeting a specific user group will override a policy targeting all users.
Exclusions
Policies with explicit exclusions for certain users or groups can affect which policies apply.
Block Overrides Grant
If any policy blocks access, it will override other policies that might grant access under certain conditions.
Key Points
The order in which policies are evaluated is not strictly linear. Instead, Entra evaluates policies based on their specificity and exclusions. When policies conflict, a blocking policy always takes precedence over a policy that grants access.
Managing Policy Precedence Effectively
To manage Conditional Access policy precedence effectively, take these important considerations into account:
Start with a Clear Strategy
Before creating policies, outline your security objectives. Decide on the specific conditions under which access should be granted or denied, and plan your policies accordingly.
Use Hierarchical Structuring
High-Level Policies: Create broad policies that cover general access requirements. For example, you might have a global policy requiring multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all users.
Specific Policies: Layer more specific policies on top of broader ones. For
example, require additional conditions for access to sensitive applications.
Avoid Policy Overlaps
Minimize the potential for conflicts by avoiding overlapping conditions across different policies. Where overlaps are necessary, ensure that the policies are designed to handle these overlaps predictably.
Regularly Review and Update Policies
As your organization grows and changes, regularly review your Conditional Access policies to ensure they still meet your security needs and are applied in the correct order.
Test Policies Before Full Deployment
Use the “Report-only” mode to test new policies without affecting user access. This helps to identify and resolve precedence issues before they impact your users.
Best Practices for Policy Naming Standards
Consistent and descriptive policy names are crucial for managing Conditional Access in a large environment. Here are some best practices for naming your policies:
Use a Clear and Descriptive Naming Structure
Your naming convention should quickly convey the purpose and scope of the policy. A common structure includes:
[Scope] – [Condition] – [Action] – [Resource]
Example:
Global – MFA Required – All Users
Admins – Block Access – Legacy Authentication
Finance – Location-Based MFA – High-Risk Apps
Include Scope and Target Audience
Incorporate details about who or what the policy applies to. This could be based on user groups, device types, or application categories.
Specify the Condition or Trigger
Include the condition that triggers the policy, such as location, device type, risk level, or application type.
State the Action Clearly
Whether the policy grants access, requires MFA, or blocks access, ensure that the action is clear in the policy name.
Utilize Versioning for Iterations
If you need to iterate on a policy, include version numbers in the name to track changes over time.
Example:
Global – MFA Required – All Users v2
Avoid Ambiguous Abbreviations
While it may be tempting to abbreviate for brevity, avoid using terms that may be unclear to others who might manage the policies in the future.
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Ignoring the Impact of Exclusions
Overuse of exclusions can lead to unintended gaps in your security posture. Be judicious in applying exclusions and review them regularly.
Overcomplicating Policy Structure
Complex policies can be difficult to manage and troubleshoot. Aim for simplicity where possible, using specific policies to address distinct scenarios rather than combining multiple conditions into one policy.
Not Documenting Policy Changes
Always document changes to your Conditional Access policies, including the rationale behind them. This practice ensures continuity and clarity when policies need to be reviewed or adjusted.
Final Thoughts
Managing Conditional Access policy precedence and naming conventions effectively is crucial for maintaining a robust security posture in Azure. Start with a clear strategy, use a hierarchical approach to structuring your policies, and ensure that your naming conventions are consistent and descriptive. Regular reviews and careful documentation will further ensure that your policies remain effective and understandable as your organization evolves.
To optimize your organization’s Conditional Access policies and enhance your overall security posture, consider partnering with our team of Entra and Azure experts. We can help you design, implement, and manage your policies for maximum effectiveness.
Contact us today to get started!
250 +
Successful Projects
30 +
Years of Experience
50 +
Service Offerings
See what our
Clients are Saying.
B2Six has been a NAB delivery partner for more than 5 years, providing project and professional services. Their deep technical expertise has allowed NAB to move at pace in its simplification journey.
NAB
Customer
We engaged B2Six Team to provide the technical expertise and automation tools to migrate one of our strategic customers. They were incredibly knowledgeable and flexible, and their automation tools made the entire process seamless.
Oreta
Customer
What stood out for us with B2Six is consistent quality of people (proficient in the domain and has significant Customer environment knowledge) and deliverables. Everyone from B2Six demonstrated a ‘can do attitude’ and you have been focused on delivering a good outcome over the commercials. Often this meant, you maintained flexibility, with strategic partnership in mind.
Large Australian Retailer
